Regarding aspect out-of personal envy, on forty mind-statement devices was claimed as the creation of this new Thinking-Report and you may Projective Jealousy Bills ( Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979 ). Of many products were utilized only once. , 1992 ) created to evaluate gender variations; the latest Multidimensional Jealousy Size ( Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989 ) created to measure the around three proportions of jealousy (cognitive, mental and you can behavioral dimensions); the fresh new Fb Jealousy Level ( Muise, Christofides, & Des ) aimed at researching the likelihood of a conference that creates attitude regarding jealousy users about the passion on the Myspace; the latest Jealousy Level ( Buunk, 1997 ), regularly see about three type of envy (reactive, stressed and you can preventive) additionally the Social Envy Level (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981 ), which assesses this new bad feeling as a consequence of actual otherwise endangered loss of a liked individual a competitor. All of the tools in the above list have demostrated adequate degrees of authenticity and reliability.
Mathes and you may Severa (1981) present several knowledge, and also the earliest data did the construction of the scale with 39 points, which was less so you’re able to 28 products just after mathematical studies
Into the Mexico, a good Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy ( Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989 ) might have been elaborated and you will an initial data is actually through with the latest Multidimensional Collection out-of Intimate Envy ( Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016 ). Inside Brazil, the fresh Romantic Envy Index is actually modified ( Bueno & Carvalho, 2012 ) For Colombia, there aren’t any psychometric studies of a particular level towards the romantic jealousy. In addition, earlier education didn’t do Factorial Confirmatory Study (CFA) to be able to corroborate the latest factor construction discover, and you may low reliability accounts was basically used in its points (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or quick samples were used (Mota ainsi que al., 2016).
From the Latin-american perspective, there’s a variation inside Chile of your Directory from Habits of the Couples That cause Jealousy ( Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014 )
Brand new IJS developed having Mathes and you can Severa (1981) the most put balances getting evaluating intimate jealousy, they receive six products one gauge the sensitivity to help you risks relevant to: (a) Lover’s cheating and matchmaking anybody else (items 1, step three, a dozen, 14, 15, sixteen, 20, 22, 23, and you will 25); (b) Lover’s prominence (items 2, 3, cuatro, 7, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and 23); (c) An untrustworthy companion (affairs step one, cuatro, 6, 19, and you will 21); (d) Lover’s old dates (circumstances 11, 24, twenty six, twenty seven, and twenty eight); (e) Partner’s apathy (circumstances 8, nine and you can 24); and (f) Partner’s left family relations which have old schedules and you may sex variations (factors 5 and you will 18).
Discover four studies having checked out regarding the reliability and legitimacy. Then, inside the the next studies, IJS beautiful hot sexy Latin women was used next to almost every other bills that examined personal love-backlinks, insecurity, self-respect and a random survey of independent identities, confirming, according to principle, that higher level away from jealousy, the better the degree of Personal love together with decreased the brand new separate name of one’s couple. Within this data, i statement an excellent coefficient away from precision out-of .ninety five towards the full measure. Within the a 3rd study, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you may Penis (1982) , in order to expand the newest evidence regarding validity, utilized the IJS as well as 2 behavioral strategies: (a) possibility when met with a competitor and you can (b) terms of possessiveness into mate, due to a mobile call that they made to the one who took part in the study. The newest questioned correlations was basically acquired, and this once again served the brand new legitimacy of the scale. Finally, during the a 4th study, Mathes, Roter and you will Joerger (1982) substantiated new convergent validity regarding IJS together with other scales one to evaluated personal jealousy.