Inspite of the significant research currently undertaken, the aforementioned books remark exposes a couple of significant restrictions. Very first, just like the indexed of the Zheng and Liu and Ioannidis et al. , next studies are necessary that commonly utilize other disciplines instance new social sciences and humanities. Next, while the investigation by the Schlagberger mais aussi al. concentrated only to the You establishments, a bigger surroundings is required to look establishments within the developing regions. To close both of these gaps, this study has boffins in personal sciences and you will humanities, environment science and sustainable creativity, whom usually are associated with Colombian associations. Because the latter commonly much like You institutions when it comes from worldwide character, any of these Colombian associations provides earned a regional profile, particularly in Latin The usa as well as the Caribbean (elizabeth.g., Universidad Nacional otherwise Universidad de Los Andes) .
Colombian scientific elite group.
New CSE list try sourced regarding AAEF webpages (2000–2020) and regarding a text published by the latest AAEF (1990–1999) commemorating its half of-century . I ple into the last 29 years’ awardees for the light from Colombian researchers’ late engagement inside publishing search blogs within the globally periodicals (since the very early 1990, ~2 hundred records was indeed wrote a year regarding Science Citation List) . I next minimal our very own attempt towards best writer otherwise user in the example of multiple-authored files. Women boffins keeps a twenty five.3% contribution among awardees, into higher contribution in the social sciences and humanities (SoSci) with eleven.4%. On the other hand, male scientists have 74.7% of your total contribution, the greatest being in physics and you will sheer sciences (PhySci) with thirty two.2%. Because the issue of sex differential certainly researchers lays not in the scope for the investigation, it’s value listing that differential among AAEPs is similar to that certainly Nobel Honor winners. Research implies that ten feminine was indeed given a beneficial Nobel Honor during the the fresh new sciences between 2004–2019, which is the same level of awardees in earliest 100 numerous years of Nobel history. Several causes were quoted so you can account fully for that it difference, for example marital and you will maternity position, not enough character models, and a lack of demand for following the an academic community. All of these perception both production and further browse for females.
S1 Dining table gift suggestions the better/last educational training from the college and you will nation with respect to the Colombian Ministry away from Science, Tech, and you will Invention system for researchers’ programs: CvLAC . Thirty-one percent regarding experts have completed an educational knowledge on the United states and twenty eight% good Ph.D. for the credible universities eg Harvard, MIT, Yale, or Wisconsin-Madison. Alternatively, 27.6% get done an academic training within the Colombia and you will twelve.6% an excellent Ph.D. when you look at the legitimate Colombian colleges such Nacional, Antioquia, Valle, or Los Andes (Pick as well as: Study accessibility).
Scopus is selected more than Web out-of Science (WoS) simply because of its larger record coverage and you will researcher involvement out of developing nations, such as for example Colombia [forty, 69–71]. According to the CSE record above, i featured and you can acquired the complete profiles within the Scopus per publisher. People with only one indexed post was indeed omitted. We and additionally looked each author’s most recent otherwise past association about CvLAC to eliminate the latest introduction of homonymous writers. The functional attempt from CSE with Scopus users contains 41 researchers, ~47% of the preliminary CSE list displayed into the Dining table step 1. To have multiple-12 months AAEP awardees, the first year was experienced to have relevant assessments. German Poveda are a modne brude certain here’s an example, having been granted 3 x (i.e., PhySci: 1999; EnvSci: 2007, 2019). We assigned him into the EnvSci group because the he had been awarded twice for the reason that group. The brand new CSE take to consists of the same sample regarding researchers compared to the past studies with the low-Nobel laureates (elizabeth.grams., 31 users of one’s Derek John de Solla Prize Medal ).